CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Brutus (2016 film)

2016 film by Costa Fam

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ21393705
Source-derived summary

Brutus (Russian: Брут) is a short film directed by Konstantin Fam of 2015, the second novel of the film trilogy "Witnesses" and the sequel of the "Shoes", dedicated to the memory of Holocaust victims.

Plot

“Brutus” continues the concept of "Witnesses" trilogy and tells us story of the Holocaust through the eyes of a German Shepherd dog Brutus. The Nuremberg Laws have separated the dog with his favorite mistress, Jewish woman. In the process of training and taming Brutus becomes a concentration camp beast-killer. The film is based on a novel of a Czech writer Ludvik Ashkenazy.

Crew

Director: Konstantin Fam

Composer: Egor Romanenko

Producers: Konstantin Fam, Ian Fisher Romanovsky, Alexey A. Petruhin, Yuri Igrusha, Egor Odintsov

Script: Konstantin Fam

Cinematography: Giora Bejach

Cast

Oksana Fandera- Rosanna

Filipp Yankovsky - Horst

Vladimir Koshevoi - Leo

Anna Churina - Clara

Maria Zykova - Ada

Marta Drozdova - Martha

Production

Filmmakers from Russia, Romania, Israel, the United States, Moldova, Belarus and the Czech Republic participated in the production.

The film was created with the financial support of the Ministry for Culture of Russia, as well as private philanthropists.

Art features

The crew used a variety of filming techniques. The main aim was to show the events through the dog's eyes.

Konstantin Fam:

-Our film will be tough, but entirely pacifist in nature.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Brutus (2016 film)” is 2016 film by Costa Fam. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Brutus, film and Costa, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive route into publication, performance and collection histories when the underlying object or edition remains clearly identified. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2016-01-01. For this dossier, Brutus, film and Costa is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “2016 film by Costa Fam” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21393705. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2015.

Critical limits

Titles can refer to several editions, objects or performances, making precise identification essential before interpretation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Brutus (2016 film)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Brutus (2016 film) primary sources, Brutus (2016 film) archive and Brutus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Brutus (2016 film)”?
  2. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
  3. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Brutus (2016 film)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.