CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Syriac Gospels, British Library, Add. 14669

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 30, 2024
Entity authorityQ4970272
Source-derived summary

British Library, Add MS 14669, Syriac manuscript of the New Testament, according to the Peshitta version, on parchment. Palaeographically it has been assigned to the 6th century. It contains fragments of the Gospels.

Description

It contains the text of the Gospel of Mark 14:71.72; 15:3-5.8-11.15.16; 15:17-40; Gospel of Luke 1:1-8 on 3 leaves (11+1⁄2 in × 8+3⁄8 in or 290 mm × 210 mm). The writing is in two columns per page, in 21-23 lines per page. The writing is a large, elegant Estrangela.

The manuscript is housed at the British Library (Add MS 14669, fol. 34-36) in London.

See also

List of the Syriac New Testament manuscripts

Other Peshitta manuscripts

Codex Phillipps 1388

British Library, Add MS 14455

British Library, Add MS 14459

British Library, Add MS 14479

Sortable articles

Syriac versions of the Bible

Biblical manuscript

References

Further reading

William Wright, Catalogue of the Syriac manuscripts in the British Museum (1870; reprint: Gorgias Press 2002).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Syriac Gospels, British Library, Add. 14669” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1388, 1870, 2002—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Syriac, Gospels and British can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 30, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q4970272. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1388, 1870 and 2002.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Syriac Gospels, British Library, Add. 14669”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Syriac Gospels, British Library, Add. 14669 primary sources, Syriac Gospels, British Library, Add. 14669 archive and Syriac research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Syriac Gospels, British Library, Add. 14669”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Syriac Gospels, British Library, Add. 14669” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.