Brief Ecstasy
1937 film by Edmond T. Gréville

Brief Ecstasy (also known as Dangerous Secrets) is a 1937 British drama film directed by Edmond T. Gréville and starring Paul Lukas, Hugh Williams, Linden Travers and Marie Ney. It was written by Basil Mason, and made at Ealing Studios as a quota quickie.
Plot
Helen Norwood falls in love with young aviator Jim Wyndham, but he has to leave for India. The years pass and she marries Professor Paul Bernardy. When Jim turns up again, Helen is still attracted to him, but it turns out he is a long-standing friend of Paul. Eventually Helen decices to stay loyal to Paul.
Cast
Paul Lukas a Professor Paul Bernardy
Hugh Williams as Jim Wyndham
Linden Travers as Helen Norwood Bernardy
Marie Ney as Martha Russell
Renee Gadd as Marjorie
Fred Withers as Gardener
Howard Douglas as Coleman
Fewlass Llewellyn as director of steel company
Peter Gawthorne as chairman of steel company
Norman Pierce as landlord
Reception
Kine Weekly wrote: "Triangle drama, cloaking a somewhat conventional story by polished acting, direction and production qualities. Although the plot, one of shattered illusions, promises more than it gives, it is, nevertheless, sufficiently near to feminine appeal to offer sound emotional refreshment for the majority. Furthermore, star values are al distinct asset."
The Daily Film Renter wrote: "Plot paucity emphasised by 'intense' directorial style, while action lamentably lacking, and players hard put to it to infuse characterisations with interest. Told mainly with large close-ups and banal dialogue, this offering is likely to please only indulgent patronage."
Writing for Night and Day in 1937, Graham Greene gave the film a good review, expressing admiration for producer Perceval's ability to "wring twenty shillings' worth out of every pound" and director Gréville's recognition that for a film whose subject is sexual passion "the story doesn't matter; it's the atmosphere which counts".
“Brief Ecstasy” enters the record as 1937 film by Edmond T. Gréville. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Brief, Ecstasy and film can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Brief Ecstasy” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Brief, Ecstasy and film provides the most credible route into that argument.
Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4967015. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1937.
Titles can refer to several editions, objects or performances, making precise identification essential before interpretation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.
- Identifying works and editions
- Tracing reception history
- Finding collection records
The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Brief Ecstasy”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Brief Ecstasy primary sources, Brief Ecstasy archive and Brief research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Brief Ecstasy”?
- Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
- How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Brief Ecstasy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.