CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Wibault 280

type of aircraft

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ3567903 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Wibault 280-T was a monoplane trimotor airliner designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Wibault. Designed to accommodate up to 12 passengers in its largest variant, development of the aircraft was financially backed by the Penhoët shipyards, which led to the aircraft alternatively being referred to as 'Penhoët Wibault'.

Development

Development of what would become the Wibault 280 was heavily financed by the Penhoët shipyards of St Nazaire. During November 1930, the prototype Penhoët Wibault 280-T performed its maiden flight from Villacoublay. It was powered by three 300 hp (224 kW) Hispano-Wright 9Qa radial engines, although these were soon replaced by three Gnome-Rhône 7Kb, after which the aircraft was redesignated the Wibault 281-T.

A second aircraft was built to the 281 standard but then it was converted to a Wibault 282-T with three 350 hp (261 kW) Gnome-Rhône 7Kd engines and room for 12 passengers, seven further aircraft were built as 282s. Some of the 282s were operated by Air Union on the Paris-London Voile d'Or ("Golden Clipper") service in 1933. During 1934, Air France took delivery of the first of ten Wibault 283-Ts which had an increased fuel capacity and modified tail. Some of the 282s were subsequently converted to 283 standard. Several commercial aircraft were later taken over as military transports.

Design

The Wibault 280 was an all-metal cantilever monoplane trimotor airliner.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Wibault 280” is type of aircraft. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Wibault, type and aircraft, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1930, 1933, 1934—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Wibault, type and aircraft is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “type of aircraft” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3567903. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1930, 1933 and 1934.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Wibault 280”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Wibault 280 primary sources, Wibault 280 archive and Wibault research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Wibault 280”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Wibault 280” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.