CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management

cabinet-level federal ministry in Brazil

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ10330427 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Ministry of Planning, Budget, and Management (Portuguese: Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento, e Gestão, abbreviated MP) is a cabinet-level federal ministry in Brazil. The Ministry was dissolved on 1 January 2019, but recreated on 1 January 2023 with Simone Tebet serving in the position.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management” as cabinet-level federal ministry in Brazil. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Ministry, Planning and Budget.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2019, 2023—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1962-01-25. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Ministry, Planning and Budget providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management”, the useful work is to connect “cabinet-level federal ministry in Brazil” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10330427. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2019 and 2023.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management primary sources, Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management archive and Ministry research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.