CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Brahmajāla Sutta

1st of 34 suttas in the Digha Nikaya; discusses the precepts Cula-sila, Majjhima-sila, and Maha-sila, and the 62 ditthi clung to by ascetics, comprising 18 about the past (pubbantanuditthino) and 44 about the future (aparantakappika)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ2923579 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Brahmajāla Sutta is the first of 34 sutta in the Dīgha Nikāya (the Long Discourses of the Buddha), the first of the five nikāya, or collections, in the Sutta Pitaka, which is one of the "three baskets" that compose the Pali Tipitaka of (Theravada) Buddhism. The name means Raft (jāla-made.of inflatable cow or buffalo skins tied to a wooden platform used to convey people from one shore to the other) of Brahmā. The sutta is also called Atthajala (Raft of Essence), Dhammajala, (Raft of the Dhamma), Ditthijala (Raft of Views), Anuttarasangama Vijaya (Incomparable Victory in Battle).

The sutta discusses two main topics: the elaboration of the "Ten Precepts" (Cula-sila) and the "Middle Precepts" (Majjhima-sila). Cula-sila deals with the Ten Precepts to be practiced by devout Buddhists, while Majjhima-sila gives a detailed description of the practice of the sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth precepts, together with a further delineation of virtuous practices and abstentions.

The second and third parts of the sutta discuss the 62 beliefs (ditthi) which are clung to by ascetics in India. These are divided into: 18 beliefs related to the past (pubbantanuditthino), and 44 beliefs about the future (aparantakappika).

Many of these beliefs are still relevant in the modern world and thus the sutta provides Buddhist scholars with much information to ponder about the Buddha's teachings.

The elaboration of these beliefs is very detailed, focusing on how the beliefs (faiths) come to be and the way they are described and declared. The elaboration ends with the Buddha's statement about the "danger of clinging to these beliefs", as they are still influenced by desire (lobha), hatred (dosa), and ignorance (avijjā) that its faithful followers will not end in the final liberation but still in the cycle of samsara.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Brahmajāla Sutta” as 1st of 34 suttas in the Digha Nikaya; discusses the precepts Cula-sila, Majjhima-sila, and Maha-sila, and the 62 ditthi clung to by ascetics, comprising 18 about the past (pubbantanuditthino) and 44 about the future (aparantakappika). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Brahmajāla, Sutta and suttas.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 291-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Brahmajāla, Sutta and suttas providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Brahmajāla Sutta”, the useful work is to connect “1st of 34 suttas in the Digha Nikaya; discusses the precepts Cula-sila, Majjhima-sila, and Maha-sila, and the 62 ditthi clung to by ascetics, comprising 18 about the past (pubbantanuditthino) and 44 about the future (aparantakappika)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2923579. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Brahmajāla Sutta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Brahmajāla Sutta primary sources, Brahmajāla Sutta archive and Brahmajāla research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Brahmajāla Sutta”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Brahmajāla Sutta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.