CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

British Journal of Health Psychology

journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ15757986 ↗
Source-derived summary

The British Journal of Health Psychology is a quarterly peer-reviewed scientific journal covering health psychology. It was established in 1996, when it was split off from the existing British Journal of Clinical Psychology. It is published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the British Psychological Society. The editors-in-chief are Madelynne Arden (Sheffield Hallam University) and Joseph Chilcot (King's College London). According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2018 impact factor of 2.472, ranking it 45th out of 130 journals in the category "Psychology, Clinical".

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “British Journal of Health Psychology” is journal. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through British, Journal and Health, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1996, 2018—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, British, Journal and Health is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “journal” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15757986. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1996 and 2018.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “British Journal of Health Psychology”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow British Journal of Health Psychology primary sources, British Journal of Health Psychology archive and British research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “British Journal of Health Psychology”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “British Journal of Health Psychology” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.