NGC 40
planetary nebula in the constellation Cepheus
NGC 40, also known as the Bow-Tie Nebula or Caldwell 2, is a planetary nebula located around 5280 light years (1619 parsecs) from Earth in the Constellation of Cepheus. The nebula is about one light-year across. It was discovered by William Herschel on November 25, 1788.
The nebula formed due to a dying star ejecting its outer layers of gas leaving behind a small, hot stellar remnant known as a white dwarf. Radiation from the star causes the shed outer layer to heat to about 10,000 degrees Celsius and become visible as a planetary nebula. About 30,000 years from now, scientists theorize that NGC 40 will fade away, leaving only a white dwarf star approximately the size of Earth.
Structure
The main structure of NGC 40 has a barrel-like shape with two moves expanding towards the northern and southern directions. The long axis pointing towards the north-northeast. There are two additional pairs of lobes around the poles, which correspond to additional ejections from the star. There is a cavity located in NGC 40 that is around 6500 years old.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “NGC 40” is planetary nebula in the constellation Cepheus. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through planetary, nebula and constellation, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “planetary nebula in the constellation Cepheus” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q43933. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1619 and 1788.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “NGC 40”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow NGC 40 primary sources, NGC 40 archive and planetary research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “NGC 40”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “NGC 40” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.