Bothe–Geiger coincidence experiment
experiment in quantum physics
In the history of quantum mechanics, the Bothe–Geiger coincidence experiment was conducted by Walther Bothe and Hans Geiger from 1924 to 1925. The experiment explored x-ray scattering from electrons to determine the nature of the conservation of energy at microscopic scales, which was contested at that time. The experiment confirmed existence of photons, the conservation of energy and the Compton scattering theory.
At that time, quantum mechanics was still under development in what was known as the old quantum theory. Under this framework, the BKS theory by Niels Bohr, Hendrik Kramers, and John C. Slater proposed the possibility that energy conservation is only true for large statistical ensembles and could be violated for small quantum systems. BKS theory also argued against the quantum nature of light. The Bothe-Geiger experiments helped disprove BKS theory, marking an end to old quantum theory, and inspiring the re-interpretation of the theory in terms of matrix mechanics by Werner Heisenberg.
The experiment used for the first time a coincidence method, thanks to the coincidence circuit developed by Bothe. Bothe received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1954 for this development and successive experiments using this method.
Motivation
In 1923, Arthur Compton had shown experimentally that x-rays were scattered elastically by free electrons, in accordance to the conservation of energy.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Bothe–Geiger coincidence experiment” is experiment in quantum physics. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Bothe, Geiger and coincidence, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “experiment in quantum physics” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q124650755. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1924, 1925, 1954 and 1923.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Bothe–Geiger coincidence experiment”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Bothe–Geiger coincidence experiment primary sources, Bothe–Geiger coincidence experiment archive and Bothe research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bothe–Geiger coincidence experiment”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Bothe–Geiger coincidence experiment” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.