CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation

scientific journal

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ5732717 ↗
Source-derived summary

African Biodiversity & Conservation Journal, formerly known as Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation and earlier simply Bothalia, is a South African peer-reviewed open access scientific journal covering African biodiversity, conservation science, zoology, and botany. It is published by the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI). The journal is indexed under its current title in major databases, while earlier articles remain listed under the name Bothalia.

Description

The journal publishes peer-reviewed research focused on African biodiversity and conservation. It operates as an open access journal, providing free access to all published content. Articles are published online continuously as they are accepted, with compiled issues released annually.

The journal is managed by the South African National Biodiversity Institute and provides a platform for research that supports biodiversity science, conservation planning, and environmental management in Africa.

History

The journal was established in 1921, producing its first issue in 1922, as an in-house journal of South Africa's National Botanical Institute. It was formally known as Bothalia from 1922 to 2014. In 2014, the title was expanded to Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation to reflect a broader scope aligned with the mandate of the South African National Biodiversity Institute.

Editorial summary

“Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation” enters the record as scientific journal. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bothalia, African and Biodiversity can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1921, 1922, 2014—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1921. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Bothalia, African and Biodiversity.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bothalia, African and Biodiversity provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5732717. 5 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1921, 1922 and 2014.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation primary sources, Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation archive and Bothalia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.