CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Daviesia cordata

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 11, 2025
Entity authorityQ5241750
Source-derived summary

Daviesia cordata, commonly known as bookleaf, is a species of flowering plant in the family Fabaceae and is endemic to the south-west of Western Australia. It is a slender, erect shrub with scattered egg-shaped phyllodes, and yellow-orange and pinkish-purple flowers.

Description

Daviesia cordata is a slender, erect, glabrous shrub that typically grows to a height of 0.5–1.2 m (1 ft 8 in – 3 ft 11 in). Its leaves are reduced to scattered, spreading, egg-shaped phyllodes 35–120 mm (1.4–4.7 in) long and 22–55 mm (0.87–2.17 in) wide, with a heart-shaped, stem-clasping base. The flowers are arranged in groups of ten to fifteen in leaf axils on a peduncle 20–70 mm (0.79–2.76 in) long, each flower on a pedicel 4.0–6.5 mm (0.16–0.26 in) long with two circular bracts 5–15 mm (0.20–0.59 in) wide at the base. The sepals are 6–7 mm (0.24–0.28 in) long and joined at the base, the upper lobes joined for most of their length and the lower three triangular and about 1.5 mm (0.059 in) long. The standard is yellow with orange at the base and tip, circular to elliptic, 10–12 mm (0.39–0.47 in) long and 6–9 mm (0.24–0.35 in) wide. The wings are pinkish-red to purple and 9.5–10.5 mm (0.37–0.41 in) long and the keel pinkish purple and 8–9 mm (0.31–0.35 in) long. Flowering occurs from July to December and the fruit is a flattened, triangular pod 12–16 mm (0.47–0.63 in) long.

Taxonomy

Davieia cordata was first formally described in 1808 by James Edward Smith in The Cyclopaedia based on specimens collected from King George Sound.

Editorial summary

“Daviesia cordata” enters the record as species of plant. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Daviesia, cordata and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1808—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Daviesia, cordata and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Daviesia cordata” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Daviesia, cordata and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 11, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5241750. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1808.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Daviesia cordata”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Daviesia cordata primary sources, Daviesia cordata archive and Daviesia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Daviesia cordata”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Daviesia cordata” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.