Booger Red
2015 film directed by Berndt Mader

Booger Red is a 2015 film directed by Berndt Mader and written by Mader and Johnny McAllister. It premiered in the Spirit Theater in the Bob Bullock Museum, as part of the Austin Film Festival, in 2015.
The film documents a journalist named Onur Turkel, played by Onur Turkel, who had experienced child abuse in his past, investigating a possibly fabricated child abuse case. Its basis is a 2009 magazine article by Michael Hall, a journalist of the Texas Monthly who investigated the controversial "Mineola Swingers' Club" case in Mineola, Texas. Mader stated that he chose to make a film on the subject because "It was all just so outrageous, wild and surreal that I just had to look into it further."
The main character, Turkel, is intended to be an audience surrogate. Mader stated that he chose the actor Turkel as he could portray a "maniac". Hall stated that the main character is "a fornicating, drug-snorting, bearded wild man who bears absolutely no resemblance to me." The main character's sister-in-law, played by Marija Karan, is his main ally.
Caitlin Moore of the Austin Chronicle wrote that "is stylistically inspired by Abbas Kiarostami's Close-Up".
References
Further reading
Hall, Michael (April 2009). "Across the Line".
“Booger Red” enters the record as 2015 film directed by Berndt Mader. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Booger, film and directed can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Booger Red” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Booger, film and directed provides the most credible route into that argument.
Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q64768623. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2015 and 2009.
Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.
- Identifying works and editions
- Tracing reception history
- Finding collection records
The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Booger Red”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Booger Red primary sources, Booger Red archive and Booger research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Booger Red”?
- Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
- How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Booger Red” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.