CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bonaventure Lüthen

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 19, 2024
Entity authorityQ95688916 ↗
Source-derived summary

Bonaventure Lüthen, S.D.S. (5 May 1846 - 10 December 1911), was a founding member of the Society of the Divine Savior, commonly called the Salvatorians, and a close collaborator of Venerable Francis Mary of the Cross Jordan. The cause for his beatification was introduced in 1943.

Life

Early life and ministry

Bernard Lüthen was born in Paderborn, Germany, to Henry and Theresia Luthen. As a young man, Bernard decided to follow his older brother, Karl, into the local diocesan seminary. After completing secondary studies in a local, Jesuit-run school, he entered the archdiocesan seminary in Paderborn. He was ordained a priest on 15 May 1872, in the Paderborn Cathedral.

Because of chronic ill health and the limitations placed on the Catholic Church by the Kulturkampf, a parish assignment was not possible. Father Bernard was assigned to serve as the private chaplain to the family of Baron von Brenken of Wewer. He dutifully served the family and household staff, gradually extending his pastoral care to include Christian mothers, for whom he created a magazine entitled Monica.

In 1877, he traveled to Donauwörth in Bavaria to begin work with Ludwig Auer, a lay Catholic who ran an institute and publishing house known as the Cassianeum.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Bonaventure Lüthen” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Bonaventure, Lüthen and Open-knowledge.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1846, 1911, 1943, 1872—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1846-05-05. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Bonaventure, Lüthen and Open-knowledge providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Bonaventure Lüthen”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 19, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q95688916. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1846, 1911, 1943 and 1872.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bonaventure Lüthen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bonaventure Lüthen primary sources, Bonaventure Lüthen archive and Bonaventure research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bonaventure Lüthen”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Bonaventure Lüthen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.