Robert Bogucki
American firefighter who survived being lost in Australia's Great Sandy Desert
Robert Bogucki (born 1966) is an American firefighter from Alaska notable for having survived 43 days in Western Australia's Great Sandy Desert before being rescued. He had headed into the desert deliberately on a spiritual quest.
Background
Bogucki's time in the desert began at the Sandfire Roadhouse, 1,900 km (1,200 mi) north of Perth in Western Australia. The roadhouse is on the Great Northern Highway between Port Hedland and Broome, 20 km (12 mi) from the coast.
Bogucki left the roadhouse on 11 July 1999, initially on his bicycle. He intended to cross the Great Sandy Desert to Fitzroy Crossing. Police were called after his bicycle and a pile of clothes were found next to a track by a group of tourists.
Search
Three Aboriginal trackers, Merridoo Walbidi, Peter Nyaparu Bumba and Mervyn Numbargardie, were called in to help and a large search party searched for Bogucki. These trackers knew the danger of the country in which Bogucki was lost, and believed that dark spirits were following him. Also included within this group was the journalist Ben Martin who was the earliest to report on the story in the Australian media.
“Robert Bogucki” enters the record as american firefighter who survived being lost in Australia's Great Sandy Desert. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Robert, Bogucki and American can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Robert Bogucki” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Robert, Bogucki and American provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3434605. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1966 and 1999.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Robert Bogucki”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Robert Bogucki primary sources, Robert Bogucki archive and Robert research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Robert Bogucki”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Robert Bogucki” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.