Vertol VZ-2
experimental helicopter by Vertol, later Boeing

The Vertol VZ-2 (or Model 76) is a research aircraft built in the United States in 1957 to investigate the tiltwing approach to vertical take-off and landing.
Design and development
The aircraft had a fuselage of tubular framework (originally uncovered) and accommodation for its pilot in a helicopter-like bubble canopy. The T-tail incorporated small ducted fans to act as thrusters for greater control at low speeds.
Ground tests began in April 1957 and on 13 August, the VZ-2 took off for the first time in hover mode only. On 23 July 1958, the aircraft made its first full transition from vertical flight to horizontal flight. By the time the test program ended in 1965, the VZ-2 had made some 450 flights, including 34 full transitions. The aircraft has been preserved by the National Air and Space Museum in storage at the Paul E. Garber Preservation, Restoration, and Storage Facility.
Specifications
General characteristics
Crew: one pilot
Capacity: 1 passenger/observer
Length: 26 ft 5 in (8.05 m)
Wingspan: 24 ft 11 in (7.59 m)
Diameter: 9 ft 6 in (2.90 m)
Height: 15 ft 0 in (4.57 m)
Empty weight: 3,700 lb (1,678 kg)
Powerplant: 1 × Avco Lycoming YT53-L-1 turboshaft , 700 hp (522 kW)
Performance
Maximum speed: 210 mph (340 km/h, 180 kn)
Range: 130 mi (210 km, 110 nmi)
Service ceiling: 13,800 ft (4,200 m)
See also
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era
Canadair CL-84 Dynavert
Dornier Do 29
Hiller X-18
Kaman K-16B
LTV XC-142
References
Taylor, Michael J. H. (1989). Jane's Encyclopedia of Aviation. London: Studio Editions.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Vertol VZ-2” is experimental helicopter by Vertol, later Boeing. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Vertol, VZ-2 and experimental, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “experimental helicopter by Vertol, later Boeing” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 12, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1144775. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1957, 1958, 1965 and 1989.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Vertol VZ-2”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Vertol VZ-2 primary sources, Vertol VZ-2 archive and Vertol research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Vertol VZ-2”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Vertol VZ-2” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.