CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Boehm-Boteler baronets

extinct baronetcy in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ4937093
Source-derived summary

The Boehm, later Boehm-Boteler baronetcy, of Wetherby Gardens in the Parish of St Mary Abbots, Kensington, in the County of London, was a title in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom. It was created on 13 July 1889 for the sculptor Joseph Boehm.

His son, the second Baronet, assumed by deed poll the additional surname of Boteler in 1918, which was that of his mother Louise Frances Boteler. The title became extinct on his death in 1928.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Boehm-Boteler baronets” is extinct baronetcy in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Boehm-Boteler, baronets and extinct, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1889, 1918, 1928—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Boehm-Boteler, baronets and extinct is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “extinct baronetcy in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4937093. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1889, 1918 and 1928.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Boehm-Boteler baronets”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Boehm-Boteler baronets primary sources, Boehm-Boteler baronets archive and Boehm-Boteler research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Boehm-Boteler baronets”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Boehm-Boteler baronets” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.