CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Elena Bodnarenco

Moldovan politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ18539959 ↗
Source-derived summary

Elena Bodnarenco (5 March 1965 – 4 July 2022) was a Moldovan politician. A member of the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova, she served in the Parliament from 2005 to 2011, 2014 to 2019, and again from 2021 to 2022.

Bodnarenco died of cancer in Chișinău on 4 July 2022 at the age of 57.

Editorial summary

“Elena Bodnarenco” enters the record as moldovan politician. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Elena, Bodnarenco and Moldovan can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1965, 2022, 2005, 2011—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1965-03-05. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Elena, Bodnarenco and Moldovan.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Elena Bodnarenco” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Elena, Bodnarenco and Moldovan provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18539959. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1965, 2022, 2005 and 2011.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Elena Bodnarenco”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Elena Bodnarenco primary sources, Elena Bodnarenco archive and Elena research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Elena Bodnarenco”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Elena Bodnarenco” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.