CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Martin Bodmer

Swiss academic (1899-1971)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ117539 ↗
Source-derived summary

Martin Bodmer (13 November 1899 – 22 March 1971) was a Swiss bibliophile, scholar and book collector who was most prominent for his vast collection of world literature which is currently housed at Bodmer Library in Cologny, Switzerland.

Early life and education

Bodmer was born 13 November 1899 in Zurich, Switzerland, the youngest of five children, to Hans Conrad Bodmer (1851–1916), an industrialist, and Mathilde Wilhelmine "Tilly" Bodmer (née Zoelly; 1866–1926), into an affluent family. His siblings were; Helene Bertha Elisabeth von Schulthess-Rechberg (née Bodmer; 1888–1970), Henry Bodmer (1889–1947), Anna Barbara Elisabeth Bodmer (1890–1897) and Hans Conrad Ferdinand Bodmer (1891–1956).

His father belonged to a well established bourgeois family from Zurich. He was an industrialist, businessman, philanthropist and most notably Belgian consul, who left a large fortune upon his death. His mother ran a literary salon which was frequented by Hugo von Hofmannsthal and Paul Valéry, a friend of the family.

In 1918, Bodmer began studying German language at the University of Zurich and spent a semester at the University of Heidelberg where he took a course from Friedrich Gundolf. Eventually, he gave up his studies and took a trip to United States and Paris. He studied a few semesters of philosophy and in 1921 he founded the Gottfried Keller Prize, a renowned Swiss literary award.

Career

In 1930 he founded the bimonthly "Corona," which was published until 1943 in Munich.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Martin Bodmer” is swiss academic (1899-1971). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Martin, Bodmer and Swiss, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1899, 1971, 1851, 1916—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1899-11-13. For this dossier, Martin, Bodmer and Swiss is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “swiss academic (1899-1971)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q117539. VIAF identifies the subject as 118948681. The Library of Congress control number is no2003117049. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1899, 1971, 1851 and 1916.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Martin Bodmer”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Martin Bodmer primary sources, Martin Bodmer archive and Martin research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Martin Bodmer”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Martin Bodmer” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.