CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Bobby L. Hill

American politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ131783247 ↗
Source-derived summary

Bobby Lee Hill (1941–2000) was an American lawyer, civil rights advocate, and politician who served in the Georgia House of Representatives. He worked for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund.

Born in Tignall, Georgia, he attended college in Savannah. He graduated from Savannah State University in 1963 and Howard University Law School in 1967. He represented Chatham County in the state legislature serving for 14 years after being first elected in 1968. In 1982 he lost his re-election campaign to Roy Allen. An interstate interchange was named in his honor.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Bobby L. Hill” is american politician. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Bobby, Hill and American, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1941, 2000, 1963, 1967—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1941. For this dossier, Bobby, Hill and American is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “american politician” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q131783247. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1941, 2000, 1963 and 1967.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bobby L. Hill”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bobby L. Hill primary sources, Bobby L. Hill archive and Bobby research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bobby L. Hill”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Bobby L. Hill” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.