CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Blackstar (spacecraft)

reported codename of a secret U.S. orbital spaceplane system

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ4923377 ↗
Source-derived summary

Blackstar is the purported name of a secret United States orbital spaceplane system. The possible existence of the Blackstar program was claimed in March 2006 by an article in Aviation Week & Space Technology (Aviation Week, AWST) magazine; the magazine claimed that the program had been underway since at least the early 1990s, and that the impetus for Blackstar was to allow the United States government to retain orbital reconnaissance capabilities jeopardized following the 1986 Challenger disaster. The article also said that the United States Air Force's Space Command was unaware of Blackstar, suggesting it was operated by an intelligence agency such as the National Reconnaissance Office.

Aviation Week speculated that such a spacecraft could also have offensive military capabilities, a concept colloquially known as "The Space Bomber". The magazine also stated that it was likely that Blackstar would be mothballed, although it is unclear whether this is due to cost or failure of the program.

The Aviation Week report, which was, and as of 2025 remains, the sole evidence of the program's possible existence, was dismissed a few days later as "almost certainly bogus" and the project termed a "technical absurdity" by Jeffrey F. Bell in an article in Space Daily.

The Blackstar system

Aviation Week describes Blackstar as a two-stage-to-orbit system, the first stage of which would be a delta-winged supersonic jet (which Aviation Week referred to as the SR-3). Its description of SR-3 is similar to the North American B-70 Valkyrie Mach 3 strategic bomber, and to patents filed in the 1980s by Boeing. The article claimed the SR-3 mothership would carry a second, smaller airframe, codenamed the XOV (eXperimental Orbital Vehicle) underneath, as a parasite aircraft. This parasite aircraft would be a rocket-powered spaceplane propelled by aerospike engines, and capable of both suborbital and orbital flight; one source quoted by the Aviation Week article estimates the XOV could reach an orbit of 300 miles (480 km) above the Earth, depending on payload and mission profile.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Blackstar (spacecraft)” as reported codename of a secret U.S. orbital spaceplane system. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006, 1986, 2025—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Blackstar, spacecraft and reported can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as reported codename of a secret U.S. orbital spaceplane system. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4923377. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006, 1986 and 2025.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Blackstar (spacecraft)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Blackstar (spacecraft) primary sources, Blackstar (spacecraft) archive and Blackstar research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Blackstar (spacecraft)”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Blackstar (spacecraft)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.