CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bitonic sorter

sorting algorithm

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ4918918
Source-derived summary

Bitonic mergesort is a parallel algorithm for sorting. It is also used as a construction method for building a sorting network. The algorithm was devised by Ken Batcher. The resulting sorting networks consist of

O

(

n

(

log

n

)

2

)

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}(n(\log n)^{2})}

comparators and have a delay of

O

(

(

log

n

)

2

)

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}((\log n)^{2})}

, where

n

{\displaystyle n}

is the number of items to be sorted. This makes it a popular choice for sorting large numbers of elements on an architecture which itself contains a large number of parallel execution units running in lockstep, such as a typical GPU.

A sorted sequence is a monotone sequence—that is, a sequence which is either non-decreasing or non-increasing. A sequence is bitonic when it consists of a non-decreasing sequence followed by a non-increasing sequence, i.e. when there exists an index

m

{\displaystyle m}

for which

x

0

x

m

x

n

1

.

{\displaystyle x_{0}\leq \cdots \leq x_{m}\geq \cdots \geq x_{n-1}.}

A bitonic sorter can only sort inputs that are bitonic. Bitonic sorters can be used to build a bitonic sort network that can sort arbitrary sequences by using the bitonic sorter with a sort-by-merge scheme, in which partial solutions are merged using bigger sorters.

The following sections present the algorithm in its original formulation, which requires an input sequence whose length

n

{\displaystyle n}

is a perfect power of two.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Bitonic sorter” as sorting algorithm. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Bitonic, sorter and sorting.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 249-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Bitonic, sorter and sorting providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Bitonic sorter”, the useful work is to connect “sorting algorithm” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4918918. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bitonic sorter”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bitonic sorter primary sources, Bitonic sorter archive and Bitonic research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bitonic sorter”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Bitonic sorter” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.