CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bite of Oregon

food festival in Portland, Oregon, U.S

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ23926616
Source-derived summary

Bite of Oregon is an annual food festival held in Portland, Oregon. Considered to be the largest in the U.S. state of Oregon, the three-day event attracts more than 50,000 attendees every year. The festival is held at Tom McCall Waterfront Park. It benefits Special Olympics Oregon.

Editorial summary

“Bite of Oregon” enters the record as food festival in Portland, Oregon, U.S. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bite, Oregon and food can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 47-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Bite, Oregon and food.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Bite of Oregon” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bite, Oregon and food provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q23926616. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bite of Oregon”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bite of Oregon primary sources, Bite of Oregon archive and Bite research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bite of Oregon”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Bite of Oregon” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.