CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Bisaltes monticola

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 22, 2021
Entity authorityQ14841353 ↗
Source-derived summary

Bisaltes monticola is a species of beetle in the family Cerambycidae. It was described by Tippmann in 1960.

Editorial summary

“Bisaltes monticola” enters the record as species of insect. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bisaltes, monticola and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1960—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Bisaltes, monticola and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Bisaltes monticola” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bisaltes, monticola and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 22, 2021. The linked authority identifier is Q14841353. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1960.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bisaltes monticola”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bisaltes monticola primary sources, Bisaltes monticola archive and Bisaltes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bisaltes monticola”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Bisaltes monticola” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.