Bipartite realization problem
decision problem asking for a bipartite graph of given degree sequence

The bipartite realization problem is a classical decision problem in graph theory, a branch of combinatorics. Given two finite sequences
(
a
1
,
…
,
a
n
)
{\displaystyle (a_{1},\dots ,a_{n})}
and
(
b
1
,
…
,
b
m
)
{\displaystyle (b_{1},\dots ,b_{m})}
of natural numbers with
m
≤
n
{\displaystyle m\leq n}
, the problem asks whether there is a labeled simple bipartite graph such that
(
a
1
,
…
,
a
n
)
,
(
b
1
,
…
,
b
m
)
{\displaystyle (a_{1},\dots ,a_{n}),(b_{1},\dots ,b_{m})}
is the degree sequence of this bipartite graph.
Solutions
The problem belongs to the complexity class P. This can be proven using the Gale–Ryser theorem, i.e., one has to validate the correctness of
n
{\displaystyle n}
inequalities.
Other notations
The problem can also be stated in terms of zero-one matrices. The connection can be seen if one realizes that each bipartite graph has a biadjacency matrix where the column sums and row sums correspond to
(
a
1
,
…
,
a
n
)
{\displaystyle (a_{1},\ldots ,a_{n})}
and
(
b
1
,
…
,
b
m
)
{\displaystyle (b_{1},\ldots ,b_{m})}
. The problem is then often denoted by 0-1-matrices for given row and column sums. In the classical literature the problem was sometimes stated in the context of contingency tables by contingency tables with given marginals. A third formulation is in terms of degree sequences of simple directed graphs with at most one loop per vertex. In this case the matrix is interpreted as the adjacency matrix of such a directed graph. When are pairs of non-negative integers ((a1,b1), ..., (an,bn)) the indegree-outdegree pairs of a labeled directed graph with at most one loop per vertex?
“Bipartite realization problem” enters the record as decision problem asking for a bipartite graph of given degree sequence. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bipartite, realization and problem can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Bipartite realization problem” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bipartite, realization and problem provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18206555. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Bipartite realization problem”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Bipartite realization problem primary sources, Bipartite realization problem archive and Bipartite research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bipartite realization problem”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Bipartite realization problem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.