CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Biochemical Society Transactions

scientific journal

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ864226
Source-derived summary

Biochemical Society Transactions is a bimonthly peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes the transactions of the annual conference and focused meetings of the Biochemical Society, together with independent meetings supported by the society. The society's annual symposium, previously published only in Biochemical Society Symposium, was first published in the Transactions in 2008. The journal was established in 1973 and is published by Portland Press, the Society's publishing arm.

The journal was issued quarterly until 1999. Since 2004, issues have been made up entirely of full papers, having previously alternated between an issue of abstracts and an issue of full papers. Transactions take the form of short papers, usually of 3–4 pages; the journal also publishes longer papers from the society's award lectures.

For the first 31 years Biochemical Society Transactions was led by Managing Editors with the first honorary editor being David J. Richardson (University of East Anglia) who was appointed in 2005. Colin Bingle succeeded David Richardson in 2015 and was appointed as editor-in-chief in 2016.

The editor-in-chief in 2026 is Professor James M. Murphy. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal had a 2025 impact factor of 4.4 with a 5-year impact factor from 2020-2025 of 4.6.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Biochemical Society Transactions” as scientific journal. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2008, 1973, 1999, 2004—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1973. The account is most persuasive where Biochemical, Society and Transactions can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as scientific journal. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q864226. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2008, 1973, 1999 and 2004.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Biochemical Society Transactions”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Biochemical Society Transactions primary sources, Biochemical Society Transactions archive and Biochemical research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Biochemical Society Transactions”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Biochemical Society Transactions” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.