Binh Minh Plastic
Vietnamese plastics company
Binh Minh Plastic Joint Stock Company (Công ty Cổ phần Nhựa Bình Minh) is a Vietnamese plastics company. It is listed in the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange since 2006.
It is one of southern Vietnam's leading plastics companies, with major competitors being Tan Tien, Rang Dong, Tan Phu, Van Don, Minh Hung and Cong Nghia.
History
Binh Minh Plastic was set up after a merger of Kepivi (Công ty ống nhựa hoá học Việt Nam) and Kieu Tinh Plastic (Công ty Nhựa Kiều Tinh công tư hợp doanh) in 1977. It was part of Vinaplast Group (Tổng Công ty Nhựa Việt Nam) from 1994 until 2003, when Vinaplast was dissolved and Binh Minh Plastic became a joint stock company.
Financial Information
Production
Binh Minh Plastic has a subsidiary in northern Vietnam with a capital stock of 100 bn VND (Công ty TNHH MTV Nhựa Bình Minh Miền Bắc), which operates a factory in Pho Noi A Industrial Park in Hưng Yên Province since 2007.
Construction on the companies fourth factory started in 2010 in Long An Province. It will be its largest and most modern. It is expected to start operation in 2013 and help increase output to 100,000 tonnes of products per year and revenue to 3 trillion dong.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Binh Minh Plastic” is vietnamese plastics company. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Binh, Minh and Plastic, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “vietnamese plastics company” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4914338. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2006, 1977, 1994 and 2003.
Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Binh Minh Plastic”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Binh Minh Plastic primary sources, Binh Minh Plastic archive and Binh research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Binh Minh Plastic”?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Binh Minh Plastic” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.