Constraint (mathematics)
condition of an optimization problem that a solution must satisfy

In mathematics, a constraint is a condition of an optimization problem that the solution must satisfy. There are several types of constraints—primarily equality constraints, inequality constraints, and integer constraints. The set of candidate solutions that satisfy all constraints is called the feasible set.
Example
The following is a simple optimization problem:
min
f
(
x
)
=
x
1
2
+
x
2
4
{\displaystyle \min f(\mathbf {x} )=x_{1}^{2}+x_{2}^{4}}
subject to
x
1
≥
1
{\displaystyle x_{1}\geq 1}
and
x
2
=
1
,
{\displaystyle x_{2}=1,}
where
x
{\displaystyle \mathbf {x} }
denotes the vector (x1, x2).
In this example, the first line defines the function to be minimized (called the objective function, loss function, or cost function). The second and third lines define two constraints, the first of which is an inequality constraint and the second of which is an equality constraint. These two constraints are hard constraints, meaning that it is required that they be satisfied; they define the feasible set of candidate solutions.
Without the constraints, the solution would be (0,0), where
f
(
x
)
{\displaystyle f(\mathbf {x} )}
has the lowest value. But this solution does not satisfy the constraints. The solution of the constrained optimization problem stated above is
x
=
(
1
,
1
)
{\displaystyle \mathbf {x} =(1,1)}
, which is the point with the smallest value of
f
(
x
)
{\displaystyle f(\mathbf {x} )}
that satisfies the two constraints.
“Constraint (mathematics)” enters the record as condition of an optimization problem that a solution must satisfy. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Constraint, mathematics and condition can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Constraint (mathematics)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Constraint, mathematics and condition provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 7, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2303305. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Constraint (mathematics)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Constraint (mathematics) primary sources, Constraint (mathematics) archive and Constraint research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Constraint (mathematics)”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Constraint (mathematics)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.