CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Big Chief Bonner

College football player and engineer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 7, 2025
Entity authorityQ19576929
Source-derived summary

William Smith "Big Chief" Bonner was a college football player and engineer.

Auburn University

Bonner was a prominent guard for Mike Donahue's Auburn Tigers of Auburn University.

1911

Bonner was captain and All-Southern in 1911. The 1911 team went 4–0–1 in conference play.

Mobile

He worked as an engineer in Mobile, Alabama.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Big Chief Bonner” as college football player and engineer. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Chief, Bonner and College.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1911—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Chief, Bonner and College providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Big Chief Bonner”, the useful work is to connect “college football player and engineer” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 7, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q19576929. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1911.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Big Chief Bonner”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Big Chief Bonner primary sources, Big Chief Bonner archive and Chief research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Big Chief Bonner”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Big Chief Bonner” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.