Pierre de Ruel, marquis de Beurnonville
Marshal of France (1752-1821)

Pierre de Ruel, marquis de Beurnonville (10 May 1752 – 23 April 1821) was a French general during the French Revolutionary Wars and later a marshal of France and Deputy Grand Master of Grand Orient de France.
Biography
Bournonville was born at Champignol-lez-Mondeville, Aube.
After service in the colonies, he married a wealthy Creole, Geneviève Gillot L'Étang. After his return to France, he purchased the post of lieutenant of the Swiss Guard of the Count of Provence.
During the French Revolution he was named lieutenant-general, and took an active part in the battles of Valmy and Jemmapes. Appointed Minister of War in February 1793, he denounced his old commander, Charles François Dumouriez, to the Convention, and was one of the four deputies sent to watch him.
Handed over by Dumouriez to the Austrians on 3 April 1793, Beurnonville was not exchanged until November 1795. He entered the service again, commanded the Army of Sambre-et-Meuse and Army of the North, and was appointed inspector of infantry of the Army of England in 1798. He was sent as ambassador to Berlin in 1800, and to Madrid in 1802.
Napoleon made him a senator and count of the empire.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Pierre de Ruel, marquis de Beurnonville” is marshal of France (1752-1821). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Pierre, Ruel and marquis, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “marshal of France (1752-1821)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q116019. VIAF identifies the subject as 46873546. The Library of Congress control number is no2010108821. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1752, 1821, 1793 and 1795.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Pierre de Ruel, marquis de Beurnonville”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Pierre de Ruel, marquis de Beurnonville primary sources, Pierre de Ruel, marquis de Beurnonville archive and Pierre research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pierre de Ruel, marquis de Beurnonville”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Pierre de Ruel, marquis de Beurnonville” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.