CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Homology (mathematics)

general way of associating a sequence of algebraic objects to other mathematical objects

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ1144780
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, the term homology, originally introduced in algebraic topology, has three primary, closely related usages. First, there is the homology of a chain complex, a sequence of abelian groups, called homology groups, which are regarded as fundamental invariants of the chain complex. Secondly, when one can associate a chain complex to a different mathematical object, one can also associate its homology to that object. Distinct procedures of associating chain complexes to a given object are grouped into homology theories. Finally, homology is important in the study of topological spaces. Under nice conditions in which distinct homology theories for a single topological space produce the same homology groups, one can define a single homology of a topological space. This last notion of homology is closely related to topological ideas frequently discussed in popular mathematics such as the holes of a surface or the cycles of a graph. There is also a related notion of the cohomology of a cochain complex, giving rise to various cohomology theories, in addition to the notion of the cohomology of a topological space.

Homology of chain complexes

We start with a chain complex, which is a sequence

(

C

,

d

)

{\displaystyle (C_{\bullet },d_{\bullet })}

of abelian groups

C

n

{\displaystyle C_{n}}

(whose elements are called chains) and group homomorphisms

d

n

{\displaystyle d_{n}}

(called boundary maps):

C

n

+

1

d

n

+

1

C

n

d

n

C

n

1

d

n

1

{\displaystyle \cdots \longrightarrow C_{n+1}{\stackrel {d_{n+1}}{\longrightarrow }}C_{n}{\stackrel {d_{n}}{\longrightarrow }}C_{n-1}{\stackrel {d_{n-1}}{\longrightarrow }}\cdots }

,

such that the composition of any two consecutive maps is zero:

d

n

d

n

+

1

=

0.

{\displaystyle d_{n}\circ d_{n+1}=0.}

The

n

{\displaystyle n}

th group of cycles,

Z

n

{\displaystyle Z_{n}}

, is given by the kernel subgroup

Z

n

=

ker

d

n

=

{

c

C

n

|

d

n

(

c

)

=

0

}

{\displaystyle Z_{n}=\ker d_{n}=\{c\in C_{n}\,|\;d_{n}(c)=0\}}

,

and the

n

{\displaystyle n}

th group of boundaries,

B

n

{\displaystyle B_{n}}

, is given by the image subgroup

B

n

:=

i

m

d

n

+

1

=

{

d

n

+

1

(

c

)

|

c

C

n

+

1

}

{\displaystyle B_{n}:=\mathrm {im} \,d_{n+1}=\{d_{n+1}(c)\,|\;c\in C_{n+1}\}}

.

Editorial summary

“Homology (mathematics)” enters the record as general way of associating a sequence of algebraic objects to other mathematical objects. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Homology, mathematics and general can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 384-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Homology, mathematics and general.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Homology (mathematics)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Homology, mathematics and general provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1144780.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Homology (mathematics)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Homology (mathematics) primary sources, Homology (mathematics) archive and Homology research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Homology (mathematics)”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Homology (mathematics)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.