CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Standardized coefficient

estimates from regression analysis on data with unit variance

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 8, 2024
Entity authorityQ17086839
Source-derived summary

In statistics, standardized (regression) coefficients, also called beta coefficients or beta weights, are the estimates resulting from a regression analysis where the underlying data have been standardized so that the variances of dependent and independent variables are equal to 1. Therefore, standardized coefficients are unitless and refer to how many standard deviations a dependent variable will change, per standard deviation increase in the predictor variable.

Usage

Standardization of the coefficient is usually done to answer the question of which of the independent variables have a greater effect on the dependent variable in a multiple regression analysis where the variables are measured in different units of measurement (for example, income measured in dollars and family size measured in number of individuals).

It may also be considered a general measure of effect size, quantifying the "magnitude" of the effect of one variable on another.

For simple linear regression with orthogonal predictors, the standardized regression coefficient equals the correlation between the independent and dependent variables.

Implementation

A regression carried out on original (unstandardized) variables produces unstandardized coefficients. A regression carried out on standardized variables produces standardized coefficients. Values for standardized and unstandardized coefficients can also be re-scaled to one another subsequent to either type of analysis.

Suppose that

β

{\displaystyle \beta }

is the regression coefficient resulting from a linear regression (predicting

y

{\displaystyle y}

by

x

{\displaystyle x}

). The standardized coefficient simply results as

β

=

s

x

s

y

β

{\displaystyle \beta ^{\ast }={\frac {s_{x}}{s_{y}}}\beta }

, where

s

x

{\displaystyle s_{x}}

and

s

y

{\displaystyle s_{y}}

are the (estimated) standard deviations of

x

{\displaystyle x}

and

y

{\displaystyle y}

, respectively.

Editorial summary

“Standardized coefficient” enters the record as estimates from regression analysis on data with unit variance. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Standardized, coefficient and estimates can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 273-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Standardized, coefficient and estimates.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Standardized coefficient” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Standardized, coefficient and estimates provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 8, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q17086839. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Standardized coefficient”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Standardized coefficient primary sources, Standardized coefficient archive and Standardized research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Standardized coefficient”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Standardized coefficient” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.