Beryl Bartlett
South African tennis player (1924–2017)
Beryl Olive Bartlett (née Nicholas; 28 May 1924 – 17 November 2017) was a tennis player from South Africa who was active in the 1950s.
Career
Bartlett teamed with American player Barbara Scofield to reach the doubles final at the 1951 French Championships. In the final, they lost in straight sets to Doris Hart and Shirley Fry. Her best Grand Slam performance in the singles was reaching the second round at the Wimbledon Championships in 1951 and 1952. Partnering Nigel Cockburn, she reached the fourth round of the mixed doubles at the 1951 Wimbledon Championships, losing to the top-seeded pairing Louise Brough and Eric Sturgess. Also in 1951, she won the All England Plate, a competition consisting of players who were defeated in the first or second rounds of the Wimbledon singles competition. In the final, she defeated Georgie Woodgate in three sets.
In 1951 and 1952, she reached the singles final at the West of England Championships, played on grass courts in Bristol, but she lost on both occasions to American players Beverly Baker and Patricia Canning Todd respectively. In June 1952, she won the singles title at the Oslo international tournament, defeating Beryl Penrose in the final.
She was part of a South African team, with Hazel Redick-Smith, Nigel Cockburn and Eric Sturgess, who played a number of test matches against an Australian team in South Africa in February and March 1952.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Beryl Bartlett” is south African tennis player (1924–2017). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Beryl, Bartlett and South, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “south African tennis player (1924–2017)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 15, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2899808. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1924, 2017, 1951 and 1952.
Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Beryl Bartlett”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Beryl Bartlett primary sources, Beryl Bartlett archive and Beryl research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Beryl Bartlett”?
- Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Beryl Bartlett” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.