Bengt Eliasson
Swedish politician
Bengt Eliasson (born 7 August 1961) is a Swedish politician and member of the Riksdag for the Liberals. He joined the Riksdag after the 2014 general elections, he currently holds seat number 41 in the Riksdag for the constituency of Halland County.
He was a candidate to the Riksdag on Halland County's ballot at place number 1 out of 22 during the 2014 general election. During the 2018 general election he campaigned at place number 1 for the Riksdag.
According to a statement given to Sveriges Television his three most important reasons for being involved in politics are 'The forgotten Sweden', equality, and infrastructure and communication.
He is a member of the Committee on Social Insurance since October 2019, he had previously served in other committees such as the Committee on Cultural Affairs from 2014 until 2018, and the Committee on the Constitution for a short period between September 2018 until October 2019.
Eliasson is also the spokesperson for the Liberals on Lagen om stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade (LSS).
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Bengt Eliasson” is swedish politician. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Bengt, Eliasson and Swedish, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “swedish politician” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18747077. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1961, 2014, 2018 and 2019.
A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Bengt Eliasson”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Bengt Eliasson primary sources, Bengt Eliasson archive and Bengt research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bengt Eliasson”?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
- Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Bengt Eliasson” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.