CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Benedict Michael

researcher

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ54238884
Source-derived summary

Benedict Michael is a British medical doctor, consultant neurologist, and researcher specialising in neurological infection and inflammation. He is Deputy Associate Pro Vice Chancellor for Clinical Research & Impact at the University of Liverpool, where he is also a Professor of Neurology. He is the Director of both the Brain Infection & Inflammation Group (BIIG) and the Liverpool Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Centre (LINC), and serves as Scientific Chair of the Encephalitis International. In addition, he is an Honorary Consultant Neurologist at the Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust.

Education

After graduating from the University of Liverpool with a degree in medicine and surgery, Michael undertook his PhD in Neuroimmunology in 2014. In 2018, he completed postdoctoral training at the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, where he developed an intravital microscopy model of viral encephalitis to image leucocyte migration into the brain in real-time. In 2022, Michael was awarded a Fellowship of the Royal College of Physicians (FRCP).

Career

Michael identified the immune protein critical for recruiting a damaging immune cell into the brain. Blocking this protein reduced brain swelling and improved outcomes. As a result, he received The Liversage Award for Neurology (NENA) and the Vera Down Award for Neuroscience from the British Medical Association.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Benedict Michael” is researcher. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Benedict, Michael and researcher, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2014, 2018, 2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Benedict, Michael and researcher is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “researcher” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q54238884. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2014, 2018 and 2022.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Benedict Michael”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Benedict Michael primary sources, Benedict Michael archive and Benedict research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Benedict Michael”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Benedict Michael” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.