CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Pwr Bttm

American queer punk duo formed in 2013

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ24204321 ↗
Source-derived summary

Pwr Bttm (disemvoweling of Power Bottom), stylized PWR BTTM, was an American queer punk duo formed in 2013 at Bard College by Ben Hopkins and Liv Bruce. The duo's debut album, Ugly Cherries, was released in 2015. Their second studio album, Pageant, was released in 2017 to critical acclaim. Pageant's release was preceded by sexual abuse allegations against Ben Hopkins, which led to the duo being dropped by both Polyvinyl and Big Scary Monsters. Pwr Bttm denied the allegations and the band broke up that same year after a falling-out between its two members.

History

Formation and Ugly Cherries (2013–2015)

Bruce and Hopkins met in 2011 while they were both attending Bard College in southeastern New York State. The band was originally a trio which played many shows at Bard College. Bruce and Hopkins spent several months working together and developing their skills as a pair before playing their first show and releasing their first demo, Cinderella Beauty Shop (2014).

Inspired by Limp Wrist and other queercore bands, Liv Bruce came up with potential band names like Hissy Fit and My Ass Hurts before deciding on Pwr Bttm. The duo's name is a vowel-less take on the term "power bottom", which is described by Fusion writer John Walker in a September 2015 article as "a receptive partner who eschews submission to play a dominant role during sex", meaning that while someone is "bottoming", they maintain the dominant power in a sexual interaction.

Editorial summary

“Pwr Bttm” enters the record as american queer punk duo formed in 2013. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bttm, American and queer can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013, 2015, 2017, 2011—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2013. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Bttm, American and queer.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Pwr Bttm” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bttm, American and queer provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q24204321. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013, 2015, 2017 and 2011.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pwr Bttm”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pwr Bttm primary sources, Pwr Bttm archive and Bttm research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pwr Bttm”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pwr Bttm” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.