CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

1904–05 Belgian First Division

10th season of top-tier football in Belgium

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ16820349 ↗
Source-derived summary

Statistics of Belgian First Division in the 1904–05 season.

Overview

This season saw the two Groups merged back into one National Division: this was also the last season before promotion and relegation was introduced with the creation of the "Promotion" Division.

It was contested by 11 teams, and Union Saint-Gilloise won the championship.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “1904–05 Belgian First Division” as 10th season of top-tier football in Belgium. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1904—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Belgian, First and Division can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as 10th season of top-tier football in Belgium. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16820349. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1904.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1904–05 Belgian First Division”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1904–05 Belgian First Division primary sources, 1904–05 Belgian First Division archive and Belgian research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1904–05 Belgian First Division”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1904–05 Belgian First Division” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.