CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

1896–97 Belgian First Division

2nd season of top-tier football in Belgium

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 28, 2025
Entity authorityQ16797886 ↗
Source-derived summary

Statistics of Belgian First Division in the 1896–97 season.

Overview

It was contested by 6 teams, and Racing Club de Bruxelles won the championship.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “1896–97 Belgian First Division” is 2nd season of top-tier football in Belgium. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Belgian, First and Division, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1896—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Belgian, First and Division is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “2nd season of top-tier football in Belgium” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 28, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q16797886. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1896.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1896–97 Belgian First Division”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1896–97 Belgian First Division primary sources, 1896–97 Belgian First Division archive and Belgian research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1896–97 Belgian First Division”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1896–97 Belgian First Division” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.