CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Belfast Project

Boston college oral history on the Troubles

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ123460080
Source-derived summary

The Belfast Project, also known as the Boston Tapes or the Boston College Tapes, was an oral history initiative based at Boston College in Massachusetts, United States, aimed at documenting personal experiences of paramilitaries during the Troubles, the armed conflict in Northern Ireland from the 1960s – 1990s. Launched in 2000 and concluding interviews in 2006, the project collected confidential testimonies from Republican and Loyalist participants of the conflict, with releases intended only after their deaths to serve as historical resources.

Directed by journalist Ed Moloney, it involved around 50 interviews, but faced intense scrutiny after subpoenas led to the release of select tapes for criminal investigations. In 2014, Boston College terminated the project and offered to return materials to living participants upon request. The project highlighted ethical dilemmas in oral history, including confidentiality limits and researcher biases.

Establishment

Ed Moloney, Robert Keating O'Neill, and Anthony McIntyre played central roles in establishing the oral history initiative. In 2000, Moloney introduced O'Neill to former IRA member Anthony McIntyre, proposing the project to collect confidential interviews with paramilitaries. O'Neill, alongside Boston College historian Thomas Hachey, supported, oversaw, and secured funding for the effort, which ran from 2001 to 2006.

Interviews

The project conducted around 50 interviews. Former IRA member turned academic Anthony McIntyre conducted interviews with Irish republican paramilitary members including Brendan Hughes, Dolours Price, Ivor Bell, and Richard O'Rawe.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Belfast Project” as boston college oral history on the Troubles. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Belfast, Project and Boston.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000, 2006, 2014, 2001—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Belfast, Project and Boston providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Belfast Project”, the useful work is to connect “boston college oral history on the Troubles” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q123460080. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000, 2006, 2014 and 2001.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Belfast Project”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Belfast Project primary sources, Belfast Project archive and Belfast research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Belfast Project”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Belfast Project” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.