CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bejrage Sorx

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ131320464 ↗
Source-derived summary

Bejrage Sorx ('Red Banner') was a Persian language newspaper published from Ashkhabad, Soviet Union 1932-1933. It was an organ of the Central Committee of the Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of Turkmenistan. The newspaper was published between April 22, 1932 and December 31, 1933. Twenty issues were published in 1933, 57 issues were published in 1933.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Bejrage Sorx” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Bejrage, Sorx and Open-knowledge.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1932, 1933—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Bejrage, Sorx and Open-knowledge providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Bejrage Sorx”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q131320464. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1932 and 1933.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bejrage Sorx”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bejrage Sorx primary sources, Bejrage Sorx archive and Bejrage research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bejrage Sorx”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Bejrage Sorx” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.