CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Beijing National Day School

school in Beijing

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ3247690
Source-derived summary

Beijing National Day School (BNDS; 北京市十一学校; lit. 'Beijing City Ten One School') is a district-level public secondary school in Haidian, Beijing, China. The school is supervised by the Beijing City Haidian District Education Committee. The term "National Day" in the school's English name refers to "October 1," the national public holiday, as mentioned in its Chinese-language name.

The school provides national curriculum and international curriculum (AP, IB DP, A-Level).

History

The school was formerly the New Beijing Ten One Primary School (北京十一小学) established in 1952 and was renamed Beijing City Ten One School in 1962.

The school started to implement the public-owned and private-run model in 1993. In 2009, the school returned to public-run.

In 2013, the school's international program received International Baccalaureate accreditation.

In 2025, Beijing National Day School hosted the second edition of the International Olympiad in Artificial Intelligence from August 2 to 9.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Beijing National Day School” as school in Beijing. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Beijing, National and School.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1952, 1962, 1993, 2009—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1952. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Beijing, National and School providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Beijing National Day School”, the useful work is to connect “school in Beijing” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3247690. Authority coordinates are 39.901, 116.249. 3 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 2 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1952, 1962, 1993 and 2009.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Beijing National Day School”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Beijing National Day School primary sources, Beijing National Day School archive and Beijing research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Beijing National Day School”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Beijing National Day School” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.