Beenleigh line
Suburban railway line in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

The T6 Beenleigh line is a suburban commuter railway line in Brisbane, Queensland. Operated by Queensland Rail, the line runs for 40.9 kilometres (25 miles) from Beenleigh to Roma Street, where services continue on the Ferny Grove line.
History
Originally known as the Logan railway line, the line opened to Loganlea in April 1885 being the first section of the South Coast line which was opened beyond Beenleigh to Southport in 1889.
The original city terminus of the line was Stanley Street, South Brisbane until a dual track line was constructed from Dutton Park to South Brisbane opposite the Victoria Bridge opening in 1891.
The railway originally approximately paralleled Fairfield Road between Dutton Park and Yeronga. Following the 1893 Brisbane flood, the Fairfield Deviation realigned the route above the flood level onto the current alignment. The line from Dutton Park to Yeerongpilly was duplicated at the same time.
The standard gauge line from Sydney which opened in 1930 was built parallel to the line from Salisbury to South Brisbane.
The section from Yeerongpilly to Kuraby was duplicated between 1950 and 1952.
With increasing popularity of the motor car, the South Coast line was closed beyond Beenleigh in 1964.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Beenleigh line” is suburban railway line in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Beenleigh, line and Suburban, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “suburban railway line in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4879912. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1885, 1889, 1891 and 1893.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Beenleigh line”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Beenleigh line primary sources, Beenleigh line archive and Beenleigh research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Beenleigh line”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Beenleigh line” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.