CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bayram of Chalybia

beg of Chalybia

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ97220396
Source-derived summary

Bayram Beg (Medieval Greek: Παριάμης; fl. 1313–32) was a ruler of Chalybia in northeastern Anatolia.

References

Bibliography

Bryer, Anthony (1975). "Greeks and Türkmens: The Pontic Exception". Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 29: 113–148. doi:10.2307/1291371. ISSN 0070-7546.

Demir, Necati (2012). "Orta ve Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesinde Çepni Türkmenleri ile Güvenç Abdal Ocağı'nın Kuruluşu" (PDF). Türk Kültürü ve Hacı Bektaş Veli Araştırmaları Dergisi (in Turkish) (63): 77–110.

Editorial summary

“Bayram of Chalybia” enters the record as beg of Chalybia. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bayram and Chalybia can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1313, 1975, 2012—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Bayram and Chalybia.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Bayram of Chalybia” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bayram and Chalybia provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q97220396. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1313, 1975 and 2012.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bayram of Chalybia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bayram of Chalybia primary sources, Bayram of Chalybia archive and Bayram research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bayram of Chalybia”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Bayram of Chalybia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.