CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Baynes baronets

baronetcy in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 29, 2023
Entity authorityQ4874656
Source-derived summary

The Baynes Baronetcy, of Harefield Place in the County of Middlesex, is a title in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom. It was created on 29 June 1801 for Christopher Baynes. He was Major-Commandant of the Uxbridge Gentlemen and Yeomanry Cavalry, which he helped to raise. The title descended from father to son until the death of his great-great-grandson, the fifth Baronet, in 1971. The late Baronet died unmarried and was succeeded by his first cousin, the sixth Baronet. He was the son of Reverend Malcolm Charles Baynes, fourth son of the third Baronet. As of 2023 the title is held by his grandson, the eighth Baronet, who succeeded his father in 2005.

Baynes baronets, of Harefield Place (1801)

Sir Christopher Baynes, 1st Baronet (1755–1837)

Sir William Baynes, 2nd Baronet (1789–1866)

Sir William John Walter Baynes, 3rd Baronet (1820–1897).

Sir Christopher William Baynes, 4th Baronet (1847–1936)

Sir William Edward Colston Baynes, 5th Baronet, MC (1876–1971)

Donald Stuart Baynes (1848–1932), 2nd son of the 3rd Baronet, died without male issue

Roderick Walter Baynes (1852–1944), 3rd son of the 3rd Baronet, died unmarried

Reverend Malcolm Charles Baynes (1853–1941), 4th son of the 3rd Baronet

Lieutenant Colonel Sir Rory Malcolm Stuart Baynes, 6th Baronet (1886–1979), eldest son of Reverend Malcolm Baynes

Lieutenant Colonel Sir John Christopher Malcolm Baynes, 7th Baronet (1928–2005). Simon Baynes is his son.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Baynes baronets” as baronetcy in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1801, 1971, 2023, 2005—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Baynes, baronets and baronetcy can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as baronetcy in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 29, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q4874656. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1801, 1971, 2023 and 2005.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Baynes baronets”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Baynes baronets primary sources, Baynes baronets archive and Baynes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Baynes baronets”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Baynes baronets” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.