Bayesian optimization
optimization technique for undifferentiable, black-box functions

Bayesian optimization is a sequential model-based strategy for global optimization of black-box objective functions whose evaluations are costly. It is commonly used when a single observation requires an experiment, engineering computation, numerical simulation, or machine-learning run, and when derivatives are unavailable or unreliable. The objective need not have a closed-form expression.
The method constructs a probabilistic model of the unknown function, often a Gaussian process (GP), and uses the resulting predictive distribution to choose the next evaluation point. This choice is made by optimizing a sampling criterion, also called an acquisition function.
Common applications include hyperparameter optimization in machine learning, where each trial may require training and validating a model, and engineering design problems driven by expensive numerical simulations.
History
Early Bayesian approaches to global optimization include work by Harold J. Kushner on locating extrema of noisy functions and work by Jonas Mockus on Bayesian methods for seeking extrema.
Expected improvement is a prominent sampling criterion in this line of work. In 1998, Donald R. Jones, Matthias Schonlau, and William J. Welch introduced the efficient global optimization (EGO) algorithm, which used a kriging or Gaussian-process model with expected improvement for expensive black-box functions.
Later work extended Bayesian optimization to noisy observations, constraints, batch and parallel evaluations, multiple objectives, and mixed or high-dimensional search spaces.
“Bayesian optimization” enters the record as optimization technique for undifferentiable, black-box functions. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bayesian, optimization and technique can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Bayesian optimization” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bayesian, optimization and technique provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17002908. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1998.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Bayesian optimization”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Bayesian optimization primary sources, Bayesian optimization archive and Bayesian research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bayesian optimization”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Bayesian optimization” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.