Battle of Tednest
Open-knowledge reference entry

The Battle of Tednest was an armed engagement that took place in 1514 near the town of Tednest in southern Morocco, involving Portuguese forces supported by Moroccan auxiliaries against Moroccan forces under Saadi sheriff Abu Abdallah al-Qaim. The Portuguese were victorious and Tednest was sacked.
The Battle
In 1513, the Moroccan coastal city of Azzemour was captured by a large Portuguese fleet under the command of the Duke of Braganza. Still that same year, several settlements around the banks of Oum Er-Rbia River such as Bencafiz and Tafuf were devastated by the Portuguese, who captured many POWs and ample warspoils, such as cattle of various kinds.
Tednest was the main settlement in the Haha region, which at the time also comprised the government of Shiedma. As a walled town containing about 3000 inhabitants, numerous mosques, crafts, a Jewish quarter with 100 homes, and a hospital for the poor. It was the residence of Saadian Sheriff Mohammed ibn Ahmed and his two sons, who had built a palace in the town. It presented a threat to Portuguese held Azamor and Safim, which were 22 leagues or about 76 English statute miles away, hence the Portuguese governor of Safim Nuno Fernandes de Ataíde sought to neutralize it.
For the projected attack he gathered 100 Portuguese horsemen and was supported by Yahya Ben Tafuft ahead of an auxiliary force numbering 3000 Muslim horsemen and 800 Arabs on foot.
Aware of their approach, the Shariff Abu Abdallah al-Qaim marched out with 4000 horses and met Ataíde and Ben Tafuft eight leagues away from Safim, however he was routed, Yahya Ben Tafuft having taken the vanguard and the initiative against him.
“Battle of Tednest” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Battle, Tednest and Open-knowledge can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Battle of Tednest” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Battle, Tednest and Open-knowledge provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q116345741. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1514 and 1513.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Battle of Tednest”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Battle of Tednest primary sources, Battle of Tednest archive and Battle research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Battle of Tednest”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Battle of Tednest” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.