Battle of Kokenhausen
1601 battle of the Polish–Swedish War
The Battle of Kokenhausen (Kokenhuza, Latvian: Koknese) was a major battle opening the Polish–Swedish War (1600–1611). It took place on the 13 June (O.S.) or 23 June (N.S.) 1601 near Koknese (in Baltic German Kokenhausen) in Livonia (now in Latvia). In the battle, Polish–Lithuanian forces defeated the Swedish relief force and captured the besieging force, relieving the Polish–Lithuanian garrison. The battle is notable as one of the greatest victories of the Polish–Lithuanian winged hussars, who defeated their numerically superior Swedish adversaries.
Prelude
Kokenhausen was one of three major forts blocking the Swedish progress on the line of the Daugava River. Swedish forces of about 2,000 under Carl Carlsson Gyllenhielm had been blockading the fortified town of Kokenhausen, located on Daugava River, between Riga and Daugavpils - since 10 March - after the arrival of Duke Charles with heavy artillery - laying a siege to it since 28 March. On 1 April the Swedes had taken the town but not the inner castle, which was still defended by a Polish–Lithuanian garrison. Charles left about 2,600 strong besieging force, and moved north to Erlaa.
The Polish–Lithuanian relief army of 800 men under Krzysztof Mikołaj "Thunderbolt" Radziwiłł arrived around 11 May and in turn started to besiege the Swedes; it grew to over 4,000 with 16 cannons by mid-June. The Swedes decided to prioritize the relief of the Kokenhausen siege force.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Battle of Kokenhausen” is 1601 battle of the Polish–Swedish War. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Battle, Kokenhausen and battle, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “1601 battle of the Polish–Swedish War” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q717073. Authority coordinates are 56.638, 25.417. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1600, 1611 and 1601.
Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Battle of Kokenhausen”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Battle of Kokenhausen primary sources, Battle of Kokenhausen archive and Battle research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Battle of Kokenhausen”?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Battle of Kokenhausen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.