CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Battle of Inlon River

1867 battle

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ4871280 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Battle of Inlon River (Chinese: 尹隆河戰役) was a major engagement of the Nian Rebellion, occurring in 1867.

References

Fu Lechen (2004). Chinese history. 大中国图书公司.

Editorial summary

“Battle of Inlon River” enters the record as 1867 battle. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Battle, Inlon and River can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1867, 2004—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Battle, Inlon and River.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Battle of Inlon River” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Battle, Inlon and River provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4871280. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1867 and 2004.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Battle of Inlon River”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Battle of Inlon River primary sources, Battle of Inlon River archive and Battle research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Battle of Inlon River”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Battle of Inlon River” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.