CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bateman-Mukai method

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ96050946
Source-derived summary

In genetics, the Bateman–Mukai method, sometimes referred to as the Bateman–Mukai technique, is a traditional method used for describing the mutation rates for genes through the observation of physical traits (phenotype) of a living organism. The method involves the maintenance of many mutation accumulation lineages of the organism studied, and it is therefore labor intensive.

Origin

The foundational papers from which this method gets its name were conducted by geneticists A. J. Bateman in 1959 and T. Mukai in 1964. Bateman used an early form of this method to understand how radiation affects the survival of chromosomes due to radiation induced mutations. Mukai's experimental design largely followed the design of Bateman's study, but rather than inducing mutations via any external factor, the study aimed to describe the spontaneous naturally occurring deleterious mutation rate of the common fruit fly.

Procedure

The method requires the establishment of many mutation accumulation lineages using within line breeding of diploid organisms. These lines are maintained in a favorable environment for deleterious mutations to accumulate so that they are not to be purged by natural selection: excess food and other resources are kept available to eliminate competition, and the parents of the next generation are chosen at random without any regards to fitness. Importantly, in this way, mutation accumulation experiments attempt to describe the true mutation rates that would be observed in the absence of natural selection.

Asexually reproducing organisms can simply have a single parent selected as the parent for the next generation of each line. In sexually reproducing organisms, measures must be taken such that researchers can be sure that mutations are inherited by future generations of the mutation accumulation lines.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Bateman-Mukai method” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Bateman-Mukai, method and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1959, 1964—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Bateman-Mukai, method and Open-knowledge is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q96050946. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1959 and 1964.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bateman-Mukai method”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bateman-Mukai method primary sources, Bateman-Mukai method archive and Bateman-Mukai research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bateman-Mukai method”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Bateman-Mukai method” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.