CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Aberrasine aberrans

species of moth

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 6, 2024
Entity authorityQ115917631
Source-derived summary

Aberrasine aberrans is a moth in the family Erebidae first described by Arthur Gardiner Butler in 1877. It is found in China (Heilongjiang, Jilin, Beijing, Shaanxi, Henan, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Fujian, Hubei, Hunan, Sichuan, Guangxi, Guangdong, Hainan), Korea, Russia, Japan and Taiwan.

The wingspan is 17–26 mm. Adults are day flying and are on wing in March.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Aberrasine aberrans” is species of moth. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Aberrasine, aberrans and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1877—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Aberrasine, aberrans and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of moth” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 6, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q115917631. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1877.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Aberrasine aberrans”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Aberrasine aberrans primary sources, Aberrasine aberrans archive and Aberrasine research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Aberrasine aberrans”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Aberrasine aberrans” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.