CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Barong (sword)

sword or knife

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ431473
Source-derived summary

The barong is a thick, leaf-shaped, single-edged blade sword. It is a weapon used by Muslim Filipino ethnolinguistic groups like the Tausug, Sama-Bajau, or Yakan in the Southern Philippines.

Description

Blade

Barong blades are thick and very heavy, with the weight enhancing the sword's slicing capability. Barong blade lengths range from 8 to 22 inches (20 to 56 cm), with an average of 14 inches. Newer blades, on the other hand, tend to be longer, measuring 18 to 22 inches (46 to 56 cm). Damascene patterns are also thick, but again most often not as controlled as the more widely known kalis.

Hilt (handle)

Most handles have a silver sleeve and lacquered braided fiber rings that sit on top. Nobility hilts were made of ivory, carabao horn, or kamagong (Philippine ebony). Other barong swords have less elaborate hilts and are smaller. Common motifs include the cockatoo (kakatua) and the sea serpent (naga).

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Barong (sword)” as sword or knife. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Barong, sword and knife.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 152-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Barong, sword and knife providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Barong (sword)”, the useful work is to connect “sword or knife” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q431473. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Barong (sword)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Barong (sword) primary sources, Barong (sword) archive and Barong research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Barong (sword)”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Barong (sword)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.